15th December 2008 |
Bishop Spews Nonsense about Filtering... |
|
| |
Because countries can filter a few child abuse sites then it is easy to filter all porn |
Can anybody explain why the Australians are bothering with trials to
test filters on 10,000 sites when there must be millions of sites
unsuitable for children
Based on
article
from
cathnews.com
|
The
Australian Catholic Bishops Conference delegate for media issues,
Bishop Peter Ingham, said other countries were miles ahead of Australia
when it came to keeping the internet as safe as possible for children.
Comparable western countries, such as the UK, Canada, Sweden,
Norway, Denmark and Finland already have ISP filtering in operation,
Bishop Ingham claimed.
In many of these countries, the ISPs themselves have initiated the
filtering in order to live up to the community's expectations that
illegal material or material that is harmful to children should not be
available on the Internet.
It is disappointing to read reports that Australia's largest Internet
provider, Telstra has said it will not participate in trials of the
federal government's national internet filter.
Bishop Ingham said the ACBC held the position that whatever could
reasonably be done to filter out illegal sites at ISP level, should be
done: Arguments that civil liberties will be infringed by internet
filtering are absolutely spurious, as the government's proposal simply
aims to ensure that the material accessible on the internet is in line
with the restrictions already in place in regard to DVDs or
publications.
Pornography of any kind is harmful to human dignity and often
degrading to women. Research shows that internet pornography is also
becoming more and more harmful to marriages and relationships. In
particular, every parent knows that much of the pornographic material
that can be found on the internet ought not to be accessible to
children.
We call on the community to get behind the federal government on
this important issue and support its attempts to keep pace with the
rest of the world when it comes to cleaning up the Net in a fair and
reasonable way.
|
28th May 2009 |
Nutters Whinge at Unwanted Conroy... |
|
| |
Whinging about backtracking from a mandatory ban on adult internet porn |
Of course Christians are welcome to base their lives on nonsense, but
what gives them the right to inflict their nonsense on more rational
people? And when non-religious people fight back, the nutters yell foul,
claiming that society is somehow being undermined by aggressive
secularists.
Based on
article
from
theage.com.au
|
The
Australian Christian Lobby has accused the Federal Government of breaking its
election promise to censor the internet after the policy was softened in the
face of relentless criticism.
The lobby's managing director, Jim Wallace, wants the Government to introduce
legislation forcing internet providers to block hardcore porn (X18+) on a
mandatory basis, in addition to illegal content. Australians would then have to
opt in to receive legal softcore (R18+) adult material.
Communications Minister Stephen Conroy has long said his policy would introduce
compulsory ISP-level filters of the Australian Communications and Media
Authority's blacklist of prohibited websites.
But he has since backtracked, saying the mandatory filters would only block
content that has been refused classification (RC) - a subset of the ACMA
blacklist - amid widespread concerns that ACMA's list contains a slew of R18+
and X18+ sites, such as regular gay and straight pornography and other legal
content.
"That doesn't meet the election promise as far as we're concerned at all,"
Wallace said in a phone interview: The promise was clearly about
providing a safer internet environment for children and to do that you need to
mandatorily block in the first instance pornography and R18+, and then provide
an opt-in system for those adults who want to access it.
|