The
unlocked church doors were a sign that all were welcome. But the Reverend Andrew
Yates has proven a little less welcoming once he knew the intentions of one
group of visitors.
Photographer Andy Craddock, his girlfriend and a couple of models used the
vicar's church in Cornwall as the backdrop for an erotic photoshoot.
Now solicitors acting on behalf of Yates have written to the photographer
accusing him of blasphemy. They say that the publication of the pictures on his
website, which include naked girls alongside religious symbols, is blasphemous,
regardless of his intentions.
They have also threatened him with legal action for trespassing, saying public
access to the church is for worship or related church activities and he
did not have permission for his photography.
Craddock pointed out that If God does exist, and there is life after death, is
someone really going to mind if one of my models is lying on their grave? I
would have thought they might be glad of the company: I haven't been struck
down by lightening yet so obviously God doesn't mind.
The series of fetishistic photos includes: a half-naked girl in suspenders on a
private grave; a blonde in the pulpit in a tutu; a half-naked blonde cavorting
in the font; two half-naked girls posing between the candles of the altar; and a
blonde girl exposing her underwear while reading a Bible by a church window.
The solicitor's letter describes blasphemy as the publication of
contemptuous, reviling, scurrilous or ludicrous matter relating to God, Jesus
Christ, the Bible or the formularies of the Church of England. [not much of
lawyer if he hasn't noticed that blasphemy laws have been repealed]
Craddock describes himself as an ‘art-house' photographer who wanted the
pictures for his portfolio. The shoot took place during the day in the middle of
the week when no one was around. He posted his girlfriend on the door of the
church as a look-out.
A spokesman for the Diocese of Truro said: The Church deplores the use of
sacred space in this way. The pictures would be deeply offensive to people who
view the place for regular worship. That's not what these buildings are intended
for and he is deliberately taking advantage of the situation. Whether he's gone
in there legally or illegally he is using the setting for an entirely improper
purpose.
|